Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

, CAA Lyon le 17/02/2011, n° 09LY02694

Requalification de la demande de logement en hébergement : la cour d’appel demande à la commission de médiation de réexaminer le dossier

Jurisprudence · Date de publication : 28/10/2011 · Date de modification : 14/03/2023

Droit au logement opposable (DALO)

Cour administrative d’appel de Lyon, 17 février 2011

Le tribunal de première instance a rejeté la demande dirigée contre la décision de la commission de médiation requalifiant la demande de logement en hébergement. La cour infirme le jugement, pourtant suffisament motivé, le requérant n’ayant eu de cesse de rechercher un logement stable (celui-ci hébergé dans des centres d’hébergement) et justifiant d’une activité professionnelle « assez stable » en tant qu’entrepreneur individuel. La cour invite la commission a rééxaminer sa décision dans un délai de deux mois.

Jurisprudence associée

© Jurislogement 2024
Avec le soutien de la Fondation pour le logement
X