Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Cour de Cassation, C de C le 23/06/2016, n° 15-20338

INTERDICTION DE COUPER L’EAU DANS UN LOGEMENT DESTINE A L’HABITATION PRINCIPALE, MEME INOCCUPE

Jurisprudence · Date de publication : 03/02/2017 · Date de modification : 26/02/2025

Droit à l'eau

Cass. Civ. 3è, 23 juin 2016, n°15-20338

Une société a acquis en 2011 une maison dans laquelle l’alimentation en eau a été coupée en 2013.

La Cour d’appel considère que la maison n’était pas habitée au moment de la coupure d’eau et que personne n’a été privé subitement, sur la base d’une décision unilatérale, d’un élément essentiel à la vie courante, à savoir l’eau.

La Cour de Cassation annule l’arrêt de la Cour d’appel en considérant que « la coupure d’eau unilatérale de l’alimentation en eau d’une maison destinée à l’habitation constitue un trouble manifestement illicite ».

Jurisprudence associée

© Jurislogement 2024
Avec le soutien de la Fondation pour le logement
X