Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Tribunal administratif, TA de Marseille le 10/07/2020, n° 2001952

Illustration du refus légitime d’une proposition de logement fondé sur sa localisation

Jurisprudence · Date de publication : 12/01/2021 · Date de modification : 25/02/2025

Droit au logement opposable (DALO)

T.A. Marseille, jugement n°2001952 du 10 juillet 2020

Une personne est reconnue prioritaire au titre du DALO.  Au terme du délai imparti, n’ayant reçu aucune proposition de logement, elle forme un recours injonction auprès du tribunal administratif. Le tribunal relève que le préfet a proposé un logement situé dans une cité du 11e arrondissement de Marseille et que le requérant, père de trois enfants dont un en bas âge, n’a pas candidaté à cause de l’insécurité notoire de ce lieu.

TA_MARSEILLE_2020-07-10

Jurisprudence associée

© Jurislogement 2024
Avec le soutien de la Fondation pour le logement
X